Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Honolulu Rail will be elevated- but what about access to it with Sea Level Rise?

Honolulu Rail will be elevated- but what about

access to it with Sea Level Rise?

 
Will the roads and parking lots all be elevated too?

What about the sewer, water, electrical systems

– all elevated?


IF NOT- Honolulu better start designing a very different 50-100 year Honolulu Rail transit plan, because the current rail route will be underwater by then.
Why is HART and the City ignoring Sea Level Rise - And Waste Billions Of Dollars?
 
Sea Level Rise, Ground Subsidence and Hurricane Storm Surge will require nearly complete rebuild of Honolulu HART Rail Line and Stations located in well identified coastal disaster area.

Hawaii Politicians played a major role in corrupting government agencies to approve badly done archeological documents and to completely ignore the warnings of 13 Federal agencies that HART Rail route will be located in the wrong place once expected disaster hits.

*****************************************************************************************

Climate Change Sustainability & Asset Management News

Marie Venner – March 2011

Hawaii DOT – Oahu MPO Climate Change Adaptation Planning/Infrastructure Vulnerability Assessment Workshop

Oahu MPO, Hawaii DOT and associated scientists, other state and federal agencies, and cultural leaders conducted a climate change adaptation workshop in Honolulu on March 8-9, 2011. Hawaii has done a number of things that may be useful in other states. First, the
state’s leading scientists have put together a brief overview of the major implications of climate change for the state. It is glossy, has pictures of the state and effects from increasing storms, storm intensities, and rising sea levels. Local, state, and federal agencies
in Hawaii are clear about the need to prepare for climate change.

The state has already prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, under FEMA, with a section on climate change mitigation (read adaptation, in DOT-speak, which roughly matches to climate change mitigation, in FEMA terms). FEMA considers it a model for other states.

Oahu MPO Executive Director Brian Gibson pointed out,

"Knowing vulnerabilities now gives us more options for addressing those vulnerabilities in the future; otherwise options are more limited and more expensive."

********************************************************************

New York Is Lagging as Seas and Risks Rise,

Critics Warn *** September 10, 2012

NOTE: This was BEFORE Hurricane Sandy did EXACTLY as predicted...

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/nyregion/new-york-faces-rising-seas-and-slow-city-action.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


But even as city officials earn high marks for environmental
awareness, critics say:

New York is moving too slowly to address the potential for flooding
that could paralyze transportation, cripple the low-lying financial
district and temporarily drive hundreds of thousands of people from
their homes. "They lack a sense of urgency about this," said Douglas
Hill, an engineer with the Storm Surge Research Group at Stony Brook
University, on Long Island.


************************************************************************

Circular No. 1165-2-211 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

INCORPORATING SEA-LEVEL CHANGE CONSIDERATIONS

IN CIVIL WORKS PROGRAMS

"Planning studies and engineering designs should consider alternatives that are
developed and assessed for the entire range of possible future rates
of sea-level change. These alternatives will include structural and
nonstructural solutions, or a combination of both. Evaluate
alternatives using "low," "intermediate," and "high" rates of future
sea-level change for both "with" and "without" project conditions."


**************************************************************************

Would the Federal government fund construction of a major airport
along the lowest levels of coastline known to be flooded in the
future? Would they build a runway where planes take off directly into
high rise buildings or a mountain?

Does it make any sense to spend Billions on a project that will have
to be ENTIRELY REBUILT in just a few decades- when the LOGICAL
MITIGATION is to MOVE the route out of known and expected future Sea
Level Rise (SLR) and Hurricane Storm Surge?

HART is charging ahead and completely and apparently WILLFULLY
IGNORANT of this BILLION dollar PLANNING FIASCO.

An important major service area of HART RAIL will be UNDER WATER,
including at least FIVE stations. This is a MASSIVE FRAUD of
incredibly bad "infrastructure planning" that will waste BILLIONS of
Federal and Oahu Tax-Payer money.

While the HART Rail is elevated, the entire planned public access and
service areas of the stations are NOT. Will we spend BILLIONS on
raised highways, parking lots, major sea water pumping stations,
concrete dams, etc.- just so the public can ACCESS the elevated HART
railway?

No comments:

Post a Comment